The First Detective Story Ever!:
Edgar Allan Poe's
"The Murders in the Rue Morgue"
by Drew R. Thomas
The analyst "makes, in silence, a host of observations and
inferences" ...
"The necessary knowledge is that of what to observe"...
"deductions" ... "Monsieur C. Auguste Dupin" --
The familiar words and phrases above
were used first by Poe in this story.
|
Note: The quotes in this
article are from "The Murders in the Rue Morgue." See Tales of Edgar Allan Poe.
The English language has changed since this story was written, so if
some grammar and punctuation looks strange to you, be aware that it
was following the standard of the day. |
When he wrote "The Murders in the Rue Morgue," Edgar Allan Poe created
the world's first detective story proper, with all the elements neatly in place.
"The Murders in the Rue Morgue" begins with a short essay
describing mental analysis and the person who employs it. Poe writes, "He
derives pleasure from even the most trivial occupations bringing his talent into
play. He is fond of enigmas, of conundrums, of hieroglyphics; exhibiting in his
solutions of each a degree of acumen which appears to the ordinary
apprehension præternatural. His results, brought about by the very soul and
essence of method, have, in truth, the whole air of intuition."
Poe states, "I am not now writing a treatise,
but simply prefacing a somewhat peculiar narrative by observations very much at
random." The essay segues into the narrative of a
strange and morbid case.
We meet the narrator, who remains unnamed throughout
the story. He describes his first meeting with the eccentric "Chevalier C.
Auguste Dupin" by "...the accident of our both being in search of the same very
rare and very remarkable volume, brought us in closer communion... " at "...an obscure library in the Rue Montmarte".
As their friendship develops, the narrator
tells us:
|
"He boasted to me, with a low chuckling
laugh, that most men, in respect to himself, wore windows in their bosoms, and
was wont to follow up such assertions by direct and very startling proofs of his
intimate knowledge of my own. His manner at these moments was frigid and
abstract; his eyes were vacant in expression; while his voice, usually a rich
tenor, rose into a treble which would have sounded petulantly but for the
deliberateness and entire distinctness of the enunciation. Observing him in
these moods, I often dwelt meditatively upon the old philosophy of the Bi-Part
Soul, and amused myself with the fancy of a double Dupin - the creative and the resolvent."
|
From newspaper accounts, we learn of the grisly murders of two women
(a mother and her daughter), and can read the accounts of witnesses:
|
"The Tragedy in the Rue
Morgue. Many individuals have been examined in relation to this
most extraordinary and frightful affair. [The word 'affaire' has not
yet, in France, that levity of import which it conveys with us,]
"but nothing whatever has transpired to throw light upon it. We give
below all the material testimony elicited. |
The paragraph above is followed by a series
of depositions from various witnesses.
We are present with Dupin's narrator friend
throughout Dupin's investigation. But then the narrator tells us, "It was his [Dupin's] humor, now to decline all conversation on
the subject of the murder, until about noon the next day. He then asked me,
suddenly, if I had observed any thing peculiar at the scene of the
atrocity."
All the clues are presented to the reader, as is Dupin's discussion of the
case with his narrator. Dupin even challenges his narrator to
attempt to reason from the clues.
Dupin places an ad in the newspaper:
| CAUGHT - In the Bois de Boulogne, early in the morning of the -
inst., (the morning of the murder,) a very large, tawny Ourang-Outang of the Bornese
species. The owner, (who is ascertained to be a sailor, belonging to a Maltese
vessel,) may have the animal again, upon identifying it satisfactorily, and
paying a few charges arising from its capture and keeping. Call at No. ---- ,
Rue ----, Faubourg St. Germain - au troisiême. |
Dupin's narrator-friend writes:
"How was it possible," I asked,
"that you should know the man to be a sailor, and belonging to a
Maltese vessel?"
"I do not know it," said Dupin. "I am not sure of it.
Here, however, is a small piece of ribbon, which from its form, and
from its greasy appearance, has evidently been used in tying the
hair in one of those long queues of which sailors are so
fond. Moreover, this knot is one which few besides sailors can tie,
and is peculiar to the Maltese. I picked the ribbon up at the foot
of the lightning-rod. It could not have belonged to either of the
deceased. Now if, after all, I am wrong in my induction from this
ribbon, that the Frenchman was a sailor belonging to a Maltese
vessel, still I can have done no harm in saying what I did in the
advertisement. If I am
in error, he will merely suppose that I have been misled by some
circumstance into which he will not take the trouble to inquire. But
if I am right, a great point is gained. Cognizant although innocent
of the murder, the Frenchman will naturally hesitate about replying
to the advertisement - about demanding the Ourang-Outang. He will
reason thus: - 'I am innocent; I am poor; my Ourang-Outang is of
great value - to one in my circumstances a fortune of itself - why
should I lose it through idle apprehensions of danger? Here it is,
within my grasp. It was found in the Bois de Boulogne - at a vast
distance from the scene of that butchery. How can it ever be
suspected that a brute beast should have done the deed? The police
are at fault - they have failed to procure the slightest clew.
Should they even trace the animal, it would be impossible to prove
me cognizant of the murder, or to implicate me in guilt on account
of that cognizance. Above all, I am known. The advertiser
designates me as the possessor of the beast. I am not sure to what
limit his knowledge may extend. Should I avoid claiming a property
of so great value, which it is known that I possess, I will render
the animal at least, liable to suspicion. It is not my policy to
attract attention either to myself or to the beast. I will answer
the advertisement,
get the Ourang-Outang, and keep it close until this matter has blown
over.' " |
Dupin gives two pistols to his narrator and
warns that the man he expects may be dangerous "Be ready," said Dupin, "with
your pistols, but neither use them nor show them until at a signal from myself."
The
sailor, shows up, Dupin confronts him with his involvement, and the case is
solved. The narrative reads as follows:
|
"Come in," said Dupin, in a cheerful and hearty tone.
A man entered. He was a sailor, evidently, - a tall, stout, and
muscular-looking person, with a certain dare-devil expression of
countenance, not altogether unprepossessing. His face, greatly sunburnt, was
more than half hidden by whisker and mustachio. He
had with him a huge oaken cudgel, but appeared to be otherwise
unarmed. He bowed awkwardly, and bade us "good evening," in French
accents, which, although somewhat Neufchatelish, were still
sufficiently indicative of a Parisian origin.
"Sit down, my friend," said Dupin. "I suppose you have called about
the Ourang-Outang. Upon my word, I almost envy you the possession of him; a
remarkably fine, and no doubt a very valuable animal. How old do you
suppose him to be?" |
And so begins the interview between the
detective and his suspect.
When comparing Poe with those who came after
him (for example, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and his stories about Sherlock Holmes)
one can easily see Poe's profound influence. That, however, remains the subject
for another article that will appear on this web site in due time.
Meanwhile, there are a number of firsts in this story:
-
It's the first detective story
-
It is a locked-room mystery
-
All clues are shown to the reader well before
the denouement, allowing you to reason and solve the mystery before the
detective explains his conclusions.
-
In Murder for Pleasure, Howard Haycraft categorizes "The Murders in the Rue Morgue"
as a "physical" story because after you've read it, the one scene which
stays in your mind forever is a physical scene. Haycraft challenges us to
think of "The Murders in the Rue Morgue." If you read it as a child, and
haven't picked it up for thirty years, the chances are enormous that the one
thing comes to mind it is a physical image. Haycraft is right, of course; but this was only
the beginning. Virtually all of the important elements that later writers of
detective stories were to use were initially developed by Poe.
You can read "The Murders in the Rue Morgue"
for free in the
Reading Room.
Genesis: 1841 |
Home
|